<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GWT vs Java vs C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalderby.com/2009/08/gwt-vs-java-vs-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalderby.com/2009/08/gwt-vs-java-vs-c/</link>
	<description>The race is on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:05:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominique De Vito</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalderby.com/2009/08/gwt-vs-java-vs-c/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominique De Vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalderby.com/?p=94#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Well, IMHO, it&#039;s close to my opinion as I have written that :
&quot;Google has released a (kind of) Java Browser Edition with GWT&quot;
http://www.jroller.com/dmdevito/entry/google_has_released_a_kind</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, IMHO, it&#8217;s close to my opinion as I have written that :<br />
&#8220;Google has released a (kind of) Java Browser Edition with GWT&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.jroller.com/dmdevito/entry/google_has_released_a_kind" rel="nofollow">http://www.jroller.com/dmdevito/entry/google_has_released_a_kind</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kumaresan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalderby.com/2009/08/gwt-vs-java-vs-c/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Kumaresan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalderby.com/?p=94#comment-188</guid>
		<description>@cbe317 can you elaborate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cbe317 can you elaborate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbe317</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalderby.com/2009/08/gwt-vs-java-vs-c/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>cbe317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalderby.com/?p=94#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Right.
The difference is not only in Javascript implementation, but mainly in the DOM implementation and his binding to Javascript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.<br />
The difference is not only in Javascript implementation, but mainly in the DOM implementation and his binding to Javascript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kumaresan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalderby.com/2009/08/gwt-vs-java-vs-c/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Kumaresan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalderby.com/?p=94#comment-186</guid>
		<description>@Sakuraba take the case of making xml http requests from java script. Its very different in case of IE and FireFox. Gwt takes care these issues.

I think you are a designer, I had written this post from a ajax developers perspective</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sakuraba take the case of making xml http requests from java script. Its very different in case of IE and FireFox. Gwt takes care these issues.</p>
<p>I think you are a designer, I had written this post from a ajax developers perspective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sakuraba</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalderby.com/2009/08/gwt-vs-java-vs-c/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Sakuraba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalderby.com/?p=94#comment-185</guid>
		<description>&quot;All these browsers have different implementations of JavaScript which cause a nightmare for developers.&quot;

Small correction here:  JavaScript is quite consistent across browsers, CSS differences are the nightmare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All these browsers have different implementations of JavaScript which cause a nightmare for developers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Small correction here:  JavaScript is quite consistent across browsers, CSS differences are the nightmare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
